Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Ethnicity gone awry




Melese's strategy to establish a governing system of ethnic federalism emphasising rights of "nations, nationalities, and peoples." This high-sounding principle, cribbed from Lenin, is more Machiavellian than Wilsonian however. If the outnumbered TPLF who direct the EPRDF/FDRE can keep other ethnic based groups divided and roiled against each other in ethnozenophobias or content to manage affairs in their own limited bailiwicks, then larger matters can be subsumed by the one governing party. Thus, what Meles view as the false ideology of nationalism for a "Greater Ethiopia" can be kept in check and its proponents divided and conquered.


1) The traditional paradigms stress the importance of either the individual, the state or the country's economic system as the relevant context and subject for analysis, rather than the cultural factors
2) Both contemplate a linear tradition-modernity transition, seeing ethnicity as belonging to an earlier, pre-modern stage of tradition and as bound to disappear as the Ethiopian society modernises.

The Ethiopian intelligentsia thought that a group's ethnic or religious identity was a traditionalist obstacle to development which would disappear as Ethiopia modernises. It was a great surprise for many to see evidence of burgeoning ethnic issues in Ethiopia, which is often interpreted as symptomatic of an anti-modernist, narrow minded ideas which are against science, industrialisation and liberal views.


It is very important to note, it is sometimes argued that contemporary ethnic consciousness expresses basic, primitive human sentiments along the lines that communities have always been divided by either language, custom, religion, race, or territory or the combination of these factors. Ethnic identities are not predetermined or inevitable, rather, they can be constructed by skillful, if unscrupulous, politicians like Meles who preach that their goal of power is best facilitated by the creation of a receptive political constituency. It is no coincidence that the recent ethinicization of politics in Ethiopia has come as grate help to Meles Zenawi.


Ethnic hatreds spawned by this scheme are the source of most human rights abuses in Ethiopia. Ethnicity played a mager role in Ethiopians being arbitrarily arrested, incarcerated without charge or trial, and brutally tortured by security forces of the government.


In Ethiopia, the world is witnessing ethnicity gone awry. The division of Ethiopia into ethnic administrative regions was mandated by the TPLF government and written into a new constitution approved by faux elections. The idea of ethnic federalism did not originate from the people nor did they approve of it in free and fair elections. In light of events in Rwanda, the Congo, and the former Yugoslavia, it is doubtful that any people willingly would subject themselves to the horrors of state-enforced ethnic warfare. In Ethiopia, the people have not been given the opportunity so to choose at the grass roots level, and until they do, ethnic federalism must be viewed as an artificial system imposed from above.


Instead of ethnicity referring to cultural-linguistic communal groups, built around ties of real or putative kinship, taking pride in the in-group, common consciousness and identity of the group-as is the case in most multi-ethnic societies--under the TPLF, cultural prejudice and social discrimination against "others" has been encouraged and perverted into denying others basic human and economic rights. This ethnicity run wild exaggerates differences, intensifies resentments and antagonisms, and sharply divides races and nationalities. Mutual suspicion and hostility are bound to emerge in a society bent on defining itself in terms of such jostling and competing groups.


In ethnic kilils, or homelands, nominally ruled by front parties of the EPRDF, but actually dominated by the central party TPLF, officials ruthlessly use political dominance, economic exploitation, and psychological oppression to drive out members of other ethnic groups who may have lived in the regions for decades--or to make life miserable for those who remain. Under the color of law, conflict and violence have been whipped up in response to imaginary threats from ethnic outsiders. As a result, the cult of ethnicity has produced adverse effects on the peace, harmony, and integration of the nation's society. The endgame of such identity politics is self-pity and self-ghettoization, and ultimately, political instability. As Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., has noted: "The meanness generated when one group is set against another, the 'built-in we-they syndrome' has caused more dominating, fearing, hating, killing than any other single cause since time began."


The solution for all this is very simple, but, hard to implement. Removing Meles and his zealots from power, and replacing them by elected officials who will be accountable, transparent and democratic to the people who vote them. Not everyone believes that they have a Strong ethnic identity which bonds them inextricably with others of there group. It is when an identity meets an explicit demand or situation that such ties become important. Unsurprisingly, some of the most powerful ethnic-orientated identities emerge out of a subordinate or superordinate position in a social hierarchy. I sum, the relation of ethnicity to politics changes; its appeal does not remain constant but is determined to a grate extent by the level of maturity, the level of material well being and security- i.e 'the feel good factor'- which Ethiopians as a community must enjoy.

1 Comments:

Blogger Personal Development said...

A typical dictionary definition of hypnosis states that it is: a state that resembles sleep but that is induced by suggestion. However, anyone who has tried hypnosis (and any self respecting hypnotist) will tell you that this is a very simplistic view of the subject!
A much better description comes from the Free Online Dictionary which states that hypnosis is: an artificially induced state of consciousness, characterised by heightened suggestibility and receptivity to direction. So what does this mean and how can it be used to your advantage?
Well, the subject of hypnosis has been discussed and pondered since the late 1700s. Many explanations and theories have come and gone though science, however, has yet to supply a valid and well-established definition of how it actually happens. It's fairly unlikely that the scientific community will arrive at a definitive explanation for hypnosis in the near future either, as the untapped resources of our 'mostly' uncharted mind still remain something of a mystery.
However, the general characteristics of hypnosis are well documented. It is a trance state characterized by extreme suggestibility, deep relaxation and heightened imaginative functioning. It's not really like sleep at all, because the subject is alert the whole time. It is most often compared to daydreaming, or the feeling you get when you watch a movie or read a captivating book. You are fully conscious, but you tune out most of the outside world. Your focus is concentrated intensely on the mental processes you are experiencing - if movies didn't provide such disassociation with everyday life and put a person in a very receptive state then they would not be as popular (nor would TV advertising be as effective!). Have you ever stated that a film wasn't great because you just couldn't 'get into it'???
This works very simply; while daydream or watching a movie, an imaginary world becomes almost real to you because it fully engages your emotional responses. Such mental pursuits will on most occasions cause real emotional responses such as fear, sadness or happiness (have you ever cried at a sad movie, felt excited by a future event not yet taken place or shivered at the thought of your worst fear?).
It is widely accepted that these states are all forms of self-hypnosis. If you take this view you can easily see that you go into and out of mild hypnotic states on a daily basis - when driving home from work, washing the dishes, or even listening to a boring conversation. Although these situations produce a mental state that is very receptive to suggestion the most powerful time for self-change occurs in the trance state brought on by intentional relaxation and focusing exercises. This deep hypnosis is often compared to the relaxed mental state between wakefulness and sleep.
In this mental state, people feel uninhibited and relaxed and they release all worries and doubts that normally occupy their mind. A similar experience occurs while you are daydreaming or watching the TV. You become so involved in the onscreen antics that worries and everyday cares fade away, until all you're focused on is the TV. In this state, you are also highly suggestible. That is why when a hypnotist tells you do something under trance; you'll probably embrace the idea completely. However, your sense of safety and morality remain entrenched throughout the experience and should either of these be threatened you immediately wake!
A hypnotist can not get you to do anything you don't want to do.
So while in such a state, when we are highly suggestible and open to new beliefs, a skillful hypnotist, whether in person or via a recording, can alter life-long behaviours and even give us new ones! subliminal messages

9:51 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home